You have downloaded this file 0 times in the last 24 hours, limit is 100.

## Contact Stress Sphere.xls This location is for Registered Users Only.Perhaps you need to login or register.

Description:

The following calculation presents an analysis of Hertzian contact stresses when a sphere is pressed against a surface (flat, convex and concave surfaces are considered). Hertzian contact problems require the dimensions of the area of contact are small compared to the radii of curvature of the contacting surfaces near the region of contact. Hertzian bearing pressure distibution is assumed to be a quadratic functions in the region of contact.

Hertzian contact stress refers to the localized stresses that develop as two curved surfaces come in contact and deform slightly under the imposed loads. This amount of deformation is dependent on the elasticity of the the material in contact, i.e., its modulus of elasticity.It gives the contact stress as a function of the normal contact force,the radii of curvature of both bodies and the modulus of elasticity of both bodies.

In gears and bearings in operation, these contact stresses are cyclic in nature and over time lead to sub-surface fatigue cracks.

Hertzian contact stress forms the foundation for the equations for load bearing capabilities in bearings, gears, and any other bodies where two surfaces are in contact.

Calculation Reference
Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain

Submitted By:
Submitted On:
11 Feb 2008
File Size:
145.50 Kb
455
File Version:
1.0
File Author:
John Doyle
Rating:
rahulmenon 9 years ago
Thanks.
rahulmenon 9 years ago
Thanks.
rathod_sn 10 years ago
Good
rathod_sn 10 years ago
Good
Ravi I have checked Roark 6th and 7th Editions and both use 0.721 rather than 0.908 so I think that the calculations is correct according to the reference.
Ravi I have checked Roark 6th and 7th Editions and both use 0.721 rather than 0.908 so I think that the calculations is correct according to the reference.
ravindra 11 years ago
As usual this is very neatly made.
I beleive there is an error in the line where "Radius of circular area" is calculated. The costant should be 0.908 instead of 0.721. Basicaly it is cube root of (3/4).
Ravi
ravindra 11 years ago
As usual this is very neatly made.
I beleive there is an error in the line where "Radius of circular area" is calculated. The costant should be 0.908 instead of 0.721. Basicaly it is cube root of (3/4).
Ravi
ILIS 11 years ago
Thanks.
ILIS 11 years ago
Thanks.

We have 238 guests and 10 members online